Filed under: Books, Miscellany | Tags: 100 Greatest Books, Dan Brown, Harper Lee
On the greatest novel of all time, being a naive English major, hating the books you read, loving the books you read, and why you should always pay attention in class:
Any poll that has The Da Vinci Code as the fifth greatest novel of all time is, frankly, null and void in my book – I don’t care what’s at the top of the list.
Besides, I stopped trusting those “greatest book lists/polls” a long time ago. Once, way back yonder, I got my hands on one of those “100 greatest books” lists. As I remember it, the list supposedly laid out the 100 greatest books ever written by American and British authors. It was given to me by my freshman English lit. professor, who asked as he handed it out, “Who can tell me what’s wrong with this list?”
I wasn’t listening. I was too busy circling all of the books that I’d read, and underlining those I’d at least heard of. The number was depressingly small. The combined number didn’t cover even half of the list. Added to that, the books that I hadn’t circled or underlined were so obscure, their titles so boring that I wasn’t sure that if given the chance I wanted to read them anyway.
But I was a newly-minted, excited and fairly naive English student. I was only a few months removed from the girl who, when she learned she’d been accepted to an English program went to the nearest bookstore and bought Laurence Stern’s Tristram Shandy. Why? Because it was the kind of novel I thought English majors would read. Though funny at times, I found it terribly exhausting and by the time I finished it I wasn’t sure if I liked it all. But that’s what English students did, I thought. They read exhausting, difficult books – not the books typically found on the bestseller lists or the romance and horror novels which had been my bread and butter though high school.
So, I was ready. I was ready to tackle the entire list from beginning to end. I would be the most well-read English student the world had ever seen. To be clear, this wasn’t about overachieving so much as it was about feeling that, having come from a poor family and gone to a poor school, I had a lot to make up for. I suspected that my fellow classmates had surely gone to better schools and had already read the great classics like George Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm. I, on the other hand, had been lucky to make it out having read at least Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Hamlet.
Over the next few months I hunted through used bookstores and loaded my library with the likes of Babbitt, The Sun Also Rises, The Great Gatsby, Catch-22, and A Brave New World. I suffered through many uninteresting “great” books as a result. A few of them I liked – A Brave New World had me thinking for days – but the majority of them left me cold. The Sun Also Rises – meh. The Great Gatsby – another, meh. I was beginning to think I was a poor English student.
Then one day as I was pouring over the list trying to decide upon a title I might actually enjoy, I finally saw what was wrong with the list. I began asking myself some very important questions. Who decided on this list? Where are the women on this list? Where are the minorities on this list? Exactly what makes these books so much more important than any other book? Why should I care, really?
The answers to those questions have been hashed and re-hashed again. Needless to say, I learned a valuable lesson – that all reading lists, from “100 greatest books” lists to “the best summer reads” lists should be taken with a grain of salt. At the end of the day, it’s all subjective. Some opinions may be more educated than others, but that doesn’t make them any more than opinions. You don’t have to like or even read a book because someone else says it’s great. Why waste your short reading life on books you probably won’t like just because you think you have to? That’s what happens when you don’t pay attention in class.
14 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>






I’m new to your blog, thanks for the interesting questions you pose. While reading this entry it was like reading about myself. I too found a list of books and made it my mission to read them all, thinking that that would make me “well read”. I was disappointed. Very few of the books I started were written after 1900 and many that were on the list were frankly terrible. I gave up in the end and now I make a “list” that is uniquely mine. Who cares if it doesn’t match some accepted list?
Comment by CarlaB June 17, 2008 @ 4:11 pmI totally agree! I think these decisions are made because the deciders want to be part of the “in-crowd,” not because the novels are any good. It’s all just literary pretension. I also feel “meh” about Fitzgerald, and I can’t stand Gatsby. Great post!
Comment by chartroose June 17, 2008 @ 6:38 pmThank you so much for this! I love this post oh so much because it is so right. “The greatest” is always subjective and some people really don’t get it. As another English major, I also took a while to figure that out. But now the concept of finding my own “best” list is so exciting. I read something because I want to read it!
I’m always a bit miffed when things like The Da Vinci Code and Harry Potter get on greatest novels lists. For goodness, it’s best seller–that doesn’t mean it’s quality literature! And it goes to show that the people making the list probably haven’t read very many books…
Comment by Rebecca Reid June 17, 2008 @ 6:53 pmYou are so right! It’s all subjective, and it took me forever to figure that out!
Comment by gentle reader June 17, 2008 @ 9:27 pmCarla B: Thanks for stopping by! If I merely looked at those popular lists I would begin to wonder, Does important mean boring? I used to think so. But after having read so many excellent, exciting, and well-written books I’ve come to the conclusion that fun and important aren’t mutually exclusive. Making up your own list is an excellent idea. I think once I’ve had a few more years of reading under my belt I might do the same.
Comment by J.S. Peyton June 18, 2008 @ 8:31 amChartroose: I agree. I think part of it may be that the decision-makers are just trying to be a part of the in-crowd. It’s part and parcel to books like “How To Talk About Books You Haven’t Read.” I wonder, why pretend? If you haven’t read it, you haven’t read it. If you don’t like a so-called “great” book, you don’t like it. I don’t need anyone to like my reading material. Why should I feel the need to like someone else’s? I gave up on that kind of silliness in high school.
Comment by J.S. Peyton June 18, 2008 @ 8:36 amRebecca: When “The Da Vinci Code” was at the height of its popularity people were always telling me I should read it. It’s great, they said. It’s the best thing they’ve read all year, they said. I always wanted to ask, ‘Was it the only thing you read all year?’ Not that anyone who liked the book couldn’t possibly read on a regular basis, but my taste is more likely to be similar to someone who reads regularly, not two books a year. In other words, their best book of the year is likely to be very different from mine. Needless to say, I read “The Da Vinci Code” and I was… unimpressed.
Comment by J.S. Peyton June 18, 2008 @ 8:45 amGentle Reader: Hey, at least you figured it out. Some people never do. I shudder to think what my reading life would be like if I succumbed to an “established” reading list. I doubt I’d be reading much at all.
Comment by J.S. Peyton June 18, 2008 @ 8:49 amHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA, The Telegraph put Da Vinci Code in the top five. Made.my.day. Thank you, Ms. Peyton.
Comment by imani June 18, 2008 @ 10:11 amOh, it was a poll. My day darkens.
Comment by imani June 18, 2008 @ 10:12 amImani: I hadn’t thought it before but this could truly be a dark day in literature history when people consider The Da Vinci Code one of the greatest novels of all time. I’m all for everyone having their own opinion but… The Da Vinci Code? Really?
Comment by J.S. Peyton June 18, 2008 @ 10:16 amDon’t know if it’ll take five years or ten, but Da Vinci Code will drop off the list of small g “greats.” A decade back I’m sure Bridges of Madison County was considered one of the best. . .
Comment by SFP July 3, 2008 @ 3:43 pmSFP: I’ve never read The Bridges of Madison County. If it’s anything like the over-hyped Da Vinci Code, I’m not sure I want to either. I didn’t hate the movie though.
Comment by J.S. Peyton July 4, 2008 @ 11:00 amI love this post! It’s so true how subjective these lists are. I have to fight the urge to read books just because I “should”, because they’re on some list…I’ve also not yet read Tristram Shandy but I remember feeling like a bad English student for having avoided it!
Comment by Logophile July 4, 2008 @ 11:06 am