BiblioAddict


Another Adaptation Bites the Dust…
December 2, 2007, 12:54 am
Filed under: Books, Film | Tags: ,

I was torn on whether or not to write this post since most people haven’t seen “The Golden Compass” film yet, and won’t see it for another week. But I just couldn’t help myself. I was steaming mad when I came out of this movie. It’s my own fault really. I called it when I said the movie wouldn’t live up to the book. But I’d hoped, I’d hoped that I would be pleasantly surprised. What’s that saying about hope? I don’t know – I can’t remember because I’m so steaming mad.

Before I continue, let me say that if you plan to see this movie and don’t want your fresh viewing spoiled by a bad review, leave now. Come back later so you can say, “Yeah! What was up with that?” For the rest of you, let me show you the ways a movie with so much promise can fall so flat. I warn you, colorful language might follow.

Let us begin with the minor quibbles (if you want to call it that – some of you might think otherwise). Somebody please get me the name and the address of the idiot who decided that having Ian McKellan do the voice of Iorek was a good idea. It wasn’t. Iorek is supposed to be a fierce, moody, unpredictable warrior bear. It was disconcerting, to say the least, to hear Gandolf every time he opened his mouth. When I hear McKlellan’s voice I think of an old powerful man getting ready to dispense a bit of wisdom. I don’t think, “Oh man, I wouldn’t want to cross that bear.” The producers of “The Golden Compass” didn’t think that having such a well-known actor (especially in the fantasy genre) do the voice of Iofer would be distracting? Or did they think, “Hey, once they hear Gandolf in the movie, they’ll have to love it!” Not so. I loved when Iofur talked in the book. Since he did it so rarely, you knew that when he did talk it was because he had something important to say. In the movie, every time he opened his mouth, I got distracted and wanted him off the screen as soon as possible.

Now on to the big stuff. I have never seen a more rushed movie in my life. Even people who’d never read the book thought that it was rushed (I overheard people talking afterwards). It was stupidly condensed and terribly edited. I know somebody at New Line Cinema knows what character development is. They did that quite well with “Lord of the Rings” so I know somebody can do it. Unfortunately that single person didn’t work on “The Golden Compass.”

Daniel Craig’s character Lord Asriel is on and off the screen so quickly you barely even see him. He scolds Lyra in the beginning, somewhere in the middle he fights (in a completely contrived scene), and you never see him again. That’s right, you never see him again. But wait, you’re probably thinking, he’s in the end; he plays a major role in the end. In the end of the book, you mean. In the movie, there is no end. But we’ll get to that in a minute.

I was talking about how rushed and stupidly condensed the movie was. Let me give you an example of what I mean: Lyra is sailing with the Gyptians on her way to the North when the witch Serafina Pekkala lands on the ship.

They talk for a bit before Serafina says something like,

“Do you have the truth teller?”
“Yes,” says Lyra.
“I’d like to see you read it,” Ms. Pekkala says.
“What shall I ask it?”
“I’d like you tell me which one these men on this ship was my lover.”

Eh? How random is that? So random that the people in the row behind me snickered around a “What?”

I gets better. So Lyra reads the compass and sees that Father Coram was Serafina’s lover. Serafina’s response? “I loved him for he was young and beautiful then.”

And why is that relevant here? This is the first time we even hear of Serafina’s character and viewers have no idea at this point that she has anything whatsoever to do with Father Coram. But apparently, in the movie witches just like putting their business out there like that. Telling it to random children no less.

And for some unfathomable reason they chose to switch scenes around. When Lyra is kidnapped by the raiders up North, they take her not to the compound where the children are being held, but to Svalbard, the bear kingdom. While there, she meets the bear king, she tricks him, and the fight between between “Iofur” and Iorek commences. And that’s another thing. You may have noticed that I put quotation marks around Iofur. That’s because for some unfathomable reason they called him Ragnar in the movie. WTF? Why? What did the producers think, “So many Io’s…the viewers will get confused. We gotta do something about this.” I mean, really? Come on.

And here’s another thing: You know Billy, the Gyptian kid? The one Lyra rescues and reunites with his family? Well ole Billy ain’t so lucky in this movie. He gets reunited with his family all right, but unfortunately he’s the kid who’s found in the shed without his daemon. The one who dies. But don’t worry, Billy doesn’t die. He’s just…confused. And you never see him again. Which is too bad really because Billy was most likable character in the movie. If you ask me, the actors who played Billy and Roger should have been switched, but I won’t quibble there. Especially since there are much juicier morsels to chew on.

Like how they made the battle at Bolvangar, the experimentation facility, the final battle of the film. Sure it’s a great fight and all, but there’s a much better one at the end of the book. Oh but wait, I guess that doesn’t count since it’s not in the film at all. SPOILER AHEAD:

This is how the movie ends: They fight at Bolvangar. Then Lyra, Roger, Iorek, and Lee Scoresby escape in the balloon, Lyra pledges to save the world, and the movie goes off. That’s right. It goes off. There’s no meeting between Lyra and her father, there’s no bridge to the city in the dust, there’s no tragic death. There’s none of that.

I understand the producers wanting to leave the movie on a cliff-hanger but the ending in the book is cliff-hanger enough! And a much better one, I might add.

So. I was not pleased. Not pleased at all. And I haven’t even touched on half the things that bothered me about this movie. I want to erase this film from my mind. But that’s what I get for going to see the film adaptation so soon after having finished the book. It’s my fault. I should have known better. New Line Cinema hasn’t decided yet whether it will make a second movie. I say don’t. Let it alone. But, if they do they won’t be getting my ten bucks again. I’ll use it to buy the book.


7 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Apparently the director filmed the original ending from the book, but that film version was sent out to…focus groups I guess (or something) and the feedback was that it was “confusing”. So they went the ra ra we win finish.

Apparently New Line’s future as a (semi)-independent studio is riding on this film. If it flops WB will re-absorb it (or get rid of it).

I had never planned to see it. The only book-to-screen adaptation I have ever been excited about was LOTR. I’m content. :) (In other words, I’m not looking forward to The Hobbit — it is an entirely different beast from LOTR but I just *know* whoever does it will go for the big epic adventure razmatazz.)

Comment by imani

I knew it! I knew there was a scene in the trailer that wasn’t in the movie. There’s a scene in the trailer in which Lyra yells, “I’m not yours, I’ll never be yours!” That scene is not in the movie, which makes sense now since it looked like something that would have been at the true end of the movie. I can see how viewers might have thought it was confusing. So much is unexplained in the movie that it’s easy to see how the ending might have confused a few people.

Ah, LOTR. Why, oh why couldn’t they have gotten Peter Jackson to direct this one too? I guess they thought that crowding The Golden Compass with actors from LOTR would be enough. It wasn’t. In fact, when they did I didn’t like it at all. You know, I’d never planned to see this movie either until I’d finished the book. I let my enjoyment of the book cloud my good sense (because the previews, truly aren’t all that inspiring), and look where it got me. Out of $11 bucks.

Sigh, I’m off to bury my nose in book. It’s what I do every time I want to forget a troubling experience.

Comment by J.S. Peyton

Oy…I’d wanted to go see this one. But since most of my desire to see it involved Daniel Craig (hmmm…yummy…), I think I’ll just pop in Casino Royale and reread the Pullman’s book instead.

On a different note, I really, really, really hated the LOTR adaptation. I enjoyed the first one, but I was so mad at the second one I would’ve walked out of the theater if I had been alone (the scene between Wormtongue and Eowyn, in case you were wondering). Perhaps I’m just not made for movie adaptations! Usually, I avoid them like the plague (I did like Stardust, though).

Comment by Eva

Oh, that’s odd Eva, that that would be the scene that made you walk out. What was it about that was so irritating? The actual moment didn’t exist in the book, but thematically (and even plot-wise) it’s pretty accurate.

Comment by imani

oh dear… i was rather feeling like seeing this. in spite of my reservations about daniel craig and the australian…

and now it sounds worse than i could’ve imagined. i must say, i agree with all your quibbles, without having seen it, of course. but what you say makes sense.

ian mckellan as iorek? bonkers! they were clearly just trying to build the interest and stature of the character – and did the opposite… oh dear…

Comment by jean pierre

I was hearing murmers of an alternate ending and your review has sealed the deal for me, I will not be seeing it. Granted, I just finished His Dark Materials about a month ago, but this, this is horrorific, any of those right wing groups who were worried about the “atheist” teachings of the books mixed in with the movie should be relieved. Roger surviving, I wonder (if they do make the future films) how that plays into the rest of the trilogy? Must miss! Thanks for warning me so that I will not lose my $10.

Comment by Christopher

Eva, really? You hated the second LOTR? I thought the the second film was kind of “Eh” but I didn’t feel the urge to walk out on it. I can’t remember which came first the second LOTR movie or the second Matrix movie. All I know is that seeing how bad the second Matrix movie was put the second LOTR movie in perspective for me. Then again, I didn’t read the book. I got through the first one, but Tolkien’s style of writing bored me until my eyes crossed.

jean pierre, I’ll tell you who I did like in this movie Nicole Kidman. She was just about perfect in the movie, even in some of her more idiotic scenes. I thought she perfectly cast.

Christopher, that exactly what I thought about the right wing groups boycotting this movie. I wish I could tell them to save their energy. It’s not worth all the controversy they’re causing around it. Of course, their idiocy will drive people to waste their 10 bucks on the movie. And most of them will never know how wasted their outrage is, because most will never see it. In this day and age, it’s only proper to judge something if you haven’t experienced it first hand.

I think Roger dies in the course of the trilogy, they just never get to it in the first film. Maybe they knew they needed to do a bit more character development with him, because with the way they made the film, I wouldn’t have cared very much if he’d died. Which is just terrible because it’s one of the most tragic moments in the book.

Comment by J.S. Peyton




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>